The debate of development vs environment has left the world in a dilemma. Especially for a country like ours, which is bursting at its seams with energetic young people, wanting to make a better life for themselves, but fail because of moral and environmental obligations. For a country, where on one side are people who barely manage to eat twice a day and on another side, a global obligation to meet its environment conservation goals, the predicament is real.
Addressing the conundrum, the Forest Advisory Committee (FAC) has approved a scheme that could allow “forests” to be traded as a commodity. FAC is an apex body tasked with adjudicating requests by the industry to raze forest land for commercial ends. If implemented, it would allow the Forest Department to outsource one of its responsibilities of reforesting to non-government agencies.
Current Scenario
In the current system, the industry needs to make up for the loss of forest by finding appropriate non-forest land — equal to that which would be razed. It also must pay the State Forest Department the current economic equivalent — called Net Present Value — of the forest land. It’s then the Forest Department’s responsibility to grow appropriate vegetation that, over time, would grow into forests. Industries have often complained that they find it hard to acquire appropriate non-forest land, which has to be contiguous to an existing forest.